Tracking number for documents to Ohio Governor Tracking number for documents to Ohio Parole Board |
EE104210679CN EE104210665CN |
Supplemental notes based on further research and discovery:
There was no official (written) requirement for post-release control until my Termination Entry was Amended ONE YEAR AFTER my release from prison. Note the Amended date and the Filed date on the AMENDED TERMINATION ENTRY enclosed.
My erroneous "sexually-oriented offender" designation was first applied by Judge G. Jack Davis, now deceased. It was not mis-assigned by the prison officials as I had believed and stated in my Application for Clemency. The Chillicothe prison officials had followed the judge's sentencing entry. This designation did not become a REGISTRATION requirement until my release from prison, as Megan's Law requires sex offenders to be registered upon release from incarceration regardless of the category of offense. I was never registered in Ohio. I was first registered in North Carolina, and subsequently in California too, then back to my current jurisdiction in NC.
The offense for which I was convicted is not merely unregisterable, it was totally NOT a sexually-oriented offense at all.
See: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/2/2007/2007-Ohio-670.pdf
4th page, {¶9} states that "R.C. 2907.322(A)(5) and 2907.323(A)(3) are not sexually oriented offenses per R.C. 2950.01(D)(1)(b)(iii) and (iv). With respect to violations of R.C. 2907.322 and 2907.323, only violations of subsections (A)(1) or (3) of R.C. 2907.322 and subsections (A)(1)or (2) of R.C. 2907.323 are defined as sexually oriented offenses, pursuant to R.C. 2950.01(D)(1)(b)(iii) and (iv). Violations of R.C. 2907.322(A)(5) and 2907.323(A)(3) are not likewise classified."
Appellate cases subsequent to the enactment of Adam Walsh laws in Ohio, have not overturned this position but have upheld the Supreme Court's finding with regard to these laws which remained in effect from 1997 through 2008, encompassing all dates of my investigation and trial and sentencing and probation and revocation and imprisonment and release and community control. http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/docs/pdf/2/2008/2008-ohio-422.pdf
I therefore should never have been categorized a sexually-oriented offender, should not have been subject to Community Control sanctions and special supervision conditions specific to sex offenders, should not have had a technical violation of my probation based upon Possession of Children's Paraphernalia, and should never have been sent to Ohio Prison.
North Carolina officials (Pender County Sheriffs and District Attorney) have stubbornly continued prosecuting me. Since my initial application to you, they have jailed me TWICE and have added brand-new charges of "Failure to Register" and for having a profile on a social network (Facebook) while registered as a sex offender. These cases are currently pending. I had fully complied with registration laws while visiting China, to the best of human ability. I was unaware that the Facebook page had become illegal. Notice of this new law's enactment was given, while I was away from home on a work assignment in California, and was properly registered in that jurisdiction as required. I missed that memo. But at all times I was operating in good faith, not trying to resist authority. Full details and documentation of my case are still publicly available at http://gregkendall.com/docs/e_summary_timeline.php.
I desperately need for Ohio to instruct NC that my sex offender registration requirement is void and dead, retroactively to the point of origin. Whatever steps are necessary to attain this result, including a Pardon and/or Expungement (sealing), should be done in the interest of justice.
CONTACT in NC - Supervisor at the State Bureau of Investigation [SBI], Criminal Information and Identification Section, Sex Offender Coordination Unit - Mike East <meast@ncdoj.gov> - 919.662.4500, x6350.
Thank you,
-Greg-